I used to love Lynx -- this looks interesting

Β· Web Β· 0 Β· 0 Β· 0

Lynx fetched & rendered ONLY text components, & had commands & hooks to fetch/render graphics if you wanted them.

browsh fetches everything & renders to (color or mono) character display -- so it appears to me you get all the performance drawbacks of fetching graphics AND THEN passing them through an unnatural rendering computation, only to get bad graphics.

I could be wrong -- browsh's site claims lower network utilization because of the text focus -- but
(a) it does display low-quality graphics,
(b) it needs to talk to a browser to do SOMETHING, and
(c) it's slow as heck to load/render

OK, I have to take the slowness complaint back entirely -- it was user error. I typed the wrong URL... access/render time is fine.

@Branford @yogthos it requires firefox (unless you 'ssh').

But you've gotta admit, this is hilarious.

@Branford I can't see too much practical use for it, presumably you could configure something like uBlock on top of FF to block graphics entirely though.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Switter, a sex work-friendly social space. Check out, our verified escort directory. Looking for listings? Visit Switter Listings Looking for Backpage alternatives?